Volume 25, Issue 15 p. 2649-2653
Brief Report

Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson's disease

Claire L. Tomlinson PhD

Corresponding Author

Claire L. Tomlinson PhD

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Robert Aitken Institute for Clinical Research, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United KingdomSearch for more papers by this author
Rebecca Stowe PhD

Rebecca Stowe PhD

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Smitaa Patel MSc

Smitaa Patel MSc

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline Rick PhD

Caroline Rick PhD

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Gray MSc

Richard Gray MSc

Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Carl E. Clarke MD

Carl E. Clarke MD

Department of Neurology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medicine and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 November 2010
Citations: 2,982

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

Abstract

Interpretation of clinical trials comparing different drug regimens for Parkinson's disease (PD) is complicated by the different dose intensities used: higher doses of levodopa and, possibly, other drugs produce better symptomatic control but more late complications. To address this problem, conversion factors have been calculated for antiparkinsonian drugs that yield a total daily levodopa equivalent dose (LED). LED estimates vary, so we undertook a systematic review of studies reporting LEDs to provide standardized formulae. Electronic database and hand searching of references identified 56 primary reports of LED estimates. Data were extracted and the mean and modal LEDs calculated. This yielded a standardized LED for each drug, providing a useful tool to express dose intensity of different antiparkinsonian drug regimens on a single scale. Using these conversion formulae to report LEDs would improve the consistency of reporting and assist the interpretation of clinical trials comparing different PD medications. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society