Volume 10, Issue 3 p. 263-266
Article

Teaching tape for the motor section of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale

Dr. Christopher G. Goetz

Corresponding Author

Dr. Christopher G. Goetz

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University/Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

1725 W. Harrison St. Chicago, IL 60612, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
Glenn T. Stebbins

Glenn T. Stebbins

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University/Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Teresa A. Chmura

Teresa A. Chmura

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University/Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
Stanley Fahn

Stanley Fahn

Department of Neurology, Columbia University/Neurological Institute, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Harold L. Klawans

Harold L. Klawans

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University/Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for more papers by this author
C. David Marsden

C. David Marsden

Department of Neurology, University of London/National Hospital Queen Square, London, England

Search for more papers by this author
First published: May 1995
Citations: 117

Abstract

We developed a teaching tape of the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to provide investigators with a visual document of three raters' interpretations of the scoring system for each item except rigidity. The rate of agreement for the selected samples was always significant, with Kendall's coefficient of concordance W ranging between 0.97 and 0.62. We also provided full UPDRS ratings on sample patients that may be used for training and for multicenter studies to assure uniformity of rating. The study identified several items of the UPDRS motor examination for which written instructions were vague, including speech, action tremor, finger taps, rapid alternating movements, and postural stability. Future versions of the scale should address these problems and correct ambiguities. This project offers the first attempt to provide a visual analog for the UPDRS.